Packetvectorpoint
Anonymised files
Anonymised report types we have actually bound
These are shapes of files, not trophies. Names, account numbers, and towns that would identify a client are gone. If your extract looks like one of these, say so in the brief.
Nothing here is a promise that your file will yield a similar cluster. Files without a window, an entity, and an extract that can be named are not reportable yet. If you are deciding between a pattern review and a full letter, read the report list and then send a brief.
Card-not-present settlements under a round threshold
Nine weeks of settlements. A cluster of amounts hugging 49 GEL and 99 GEL after midnight, all to the same acquirer MID. The useful plate was a histogram by hour, not a map of Georgia. The merchant already knew refunds were high; they did not know the hour.
Three beneficiary changes in nine days
Each change sat below dual control. Same new IBAN. The letter named the window and admitted the wet-ink forms were never in the pack. Counsel later asked for row references in a separate evidence pack.
Motor claims with rotating workshop images
Twenty-two folders. Four clusters on the timeline. Photo dates mostly stripped. The oral note for committee led with that gap so nobody performed certainty. Two folders later moved to a full findings letter.
Refund loop on a single till group
Cycle letters were quiet for three months. Cycle four showed refunds to the same wallet growing on one till group. The periodic letter stopped. A findings letter took the following window, with exhibits of till IDs rather than staff names — names were not in the extract.